An IRS Whistleblower says Hunter Biden was protected for political reasons, and that is why the case opened against him in 2018 has gone nowhere.

It was a stunning revelation outlined in a letter from Washington, DC, attorney Mark Lytle to the US House of Representatives and Senate. Lytle added that his client, now protected under whistleblower statutes, would like to make all his disclosures directly to Congress.

In fact, Lytle says his client has already begun the process of making legally protected statements to the IRS, leading to more disclosures in the days to come.
Lytle says his client—who, of course, remains anonymous—can prove that a key investigator failed to mitigate “clear conflicts of interest” and allegedly allowed preferential treatment of the First Son. Apparently, the whole investigation into Hunter Biden was infected with politics and violated protocols typically followed by law enforcement professionals.

The whistleblower, according to John Solomon and Just the News, is a “decorated supervisory IRS agent that has reported to the Justice Department’s top watchdog that federal prosecutors appointed by Joe Biden have engaged in ‘preferential treatment and politics’ to block criminal tax charges against presidential son Hunter Biden, providing evidence as a whistleblower that conflicts with Attorney General Merrick Garland’s recent testimony to Congress that the decision to bring charges against Biden was being left to the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for Delaware.”

It brings into question the integrity and independence of the Department of Justice under the leadership of Garland.

The letter does not state that the whistleblower’s disclosures are related to Hunter Biden. However, Just the News has independently confirmed the agent’s allegations involve the Hunter Biden probe being led by Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss, a Trump holdover, according to people directly familiar with the matter.
In a letter Wednesday to Republicans and Democrats of multiple Congressional oversight committees, Lytle wrote: “The protected disclosures: (l) contradict sworn testimony to Congress by a senior political appointee, (2) involve failure to mitigate clear conflicts of interest in the ultimate disposition of the case, and (3) detail examples of preferential treatment and politics improperly infecting decisions and protocols that would normally be followed by career law enforcement professionals in similar circumstances if the subject were not politically connected.”
The remarkable thing about these earth-shattering revelations is that, for once, they are not being buried by the mainstream corporate media.
In fact, it has been picked up by major media companies like CBS and The Wall Street Journal. It seems that, unlike the Hunter Laptop, this story will not be buried.
And it seems to me that when one of these whistleblowers shows up and runs the gauntlet, others will soon follow. I am looking for more to come forward in the coming days as we learn more about what transpired.