Today we will discuss the election in clear terms of hope versus fear.

Not since President Eisenhower spoke about the dangers of the military-industrial complex has a leader sounded so prophetic—until now.

Not since President Reagan spoke about the genius of the American people has a leader sounded so optimistic about the greatness of America—until now.

And it’s not for nothing that warmongers in both major parties oppose President Trump. So, when a military veteran and a former Democrat endorses President Trump, it matters. 
When this person is also a former congresswoman and presidential candidate, it matters a great deal. 

When this person is Tulsi Gabbard, who is herself on a government watch list, she knows what it means to be a target of the deep state.

Because the deep state continues to target President Trump, and because Special Counsel Jack Smith wants to persecute President Trump in the worst way, the deep state will do anything to stop or subvert the election of President Trump.

It’s not for nothing that President Trump represents the best qualities of the two best presidents of the last 70 years. 

The legacy of both is real and substantial. The appeal of both is bipartisan and national. Each speaks to us still, cautioning us about the dangers of the state, imploring us to be mindful of what the limited and enumerated powers of the state are, and that the states created the federal government, not the other way around.

And yet, for every Democrat who likes to quote Eisenhower, there is not a single Democrat who follows his advice. Show me a war Joe Biden opposes. Show me a war Kamala Harris is against. Show me a war Tim Walz would not have others fight in his place. 

Ukraine, Russia, and Syria—Democrats would have us intervene in all three. Democrats would have us invade Europe, Asia, and the Mideast to make the world more dangerous under the false flag of national security.

As for the deep state, Democrats support it—hell, they reinforce it, defend it, and most days live it. Democrats deny the deep state exists of course and fund it just the same. 
Democrats deny the very wrongdoing they commit, which is why they mistake political show trials for justice.

If perpetual war is how Democrats define foreign policy, lawfare is what Democrats do when they control domestic policy.
 
The trials of President Trump are the policies of Biden and Harris, and Merrick Garland and Jack Smith. The trials are an attempt to bankrupt, shame, isolate, and remove—by way of a jury verdict—President Trump. 

The trials are a dishonest and disproportionate response, which is something Democrats otherwise oppose but won’t stop for the Orange Man.

We hear Democrats condemning such things, citing what they call, Israel’s “disproportionate response” to Hamas. We hear Democrats calling for a ceasefire. We hear Democrats talking about peace—not only talking but demanding that Israel accept an unjust peace—while these same people call for unlimited war against President Trump. 

Such is the hypocrisy of Democrats who use the criminal justice system to disenfranchise tens of millions while costing the nation billions in legal fees.

A party this corrupt has no right to lecture us about the virtue and legality of indicting President Trump. No party this eager to abuse power has the right to exercise it.
We must not be a party to this attack on our democracy—our Republic deserves so much more and much better.

We must heed President Eisenhower’s warning because the military-industrial complex is real, the deep state powerful, and the surveillance state is dangerous.

Instead of the night-watchman state, which performs a few essential functions, such as protecting citizens from violence, theft, and fraud, we have the surveillance state of big government and big tech and big pharma and big donors—all with a healthy dose of censorship and corruption stirred in.

If Democrats get their way, we will sound British and act French.

The state will police everything we post, like, text, tweet, or share. Anyone who refuses to participate in this criminal conspiracy to cancel free speech will go to jail for a very long time.

If you run a tech company and refuse to allow the state to invade the privacy of those who use your service, if you dare to say you support a person’s right to choose, that you believe not only in freedom of speech but freedom from speech, that no one has to listen to anyone—if you are so fair as to be neutral, you are in trouble.

Because you believe in fairness, because you know what fairness means, you insist that our institutions—our courts, our schools, our public markets, our civil service—enforce it. 
Like President Reagan, you insist on freedom.

Like President Reagan, you also know that a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth.

And like the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, you and I know that America is the last best hope on earth: that we shall nobly save or tragically lose the Republic.
Here then is Reagan in his own words:
 
“You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness.”

President Trump shares these sentiments. 

He believes liberty is more than sentimental, it is sacred and irreplaceable.

Our defense of liberty must be sacred, too.

Against the intrusions of the deep state, against the deep state’s contempt for liberty and hatred of justice for all, we must not lower or weaken our defense.

Against the pessimism of the Democrat Party, we must not lose our sense of optimism.

Against the hacks in the Democrat Party, we cannot lose.

Against Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, we shall not lose.

With President Eisenhower to guide us, we shall be vigilant.

With President Reagan to inspire us, we shall be positive.

With President Trump to lead us, we will make America great again.

Come Tuesday, November 5, President Trump’s victory will be the final verdict.